SUBMIT A SITE | REVIEW CRITERIA | REVIEWER'S BIO'S

CRITERIA
All sites are graded by two different "judges" on a 1-10 scale, 10 of course being the best. You will see the results from each individual reviewer, plus a final, combined average from both. Here are the categories for the review:

CATEGORY	HOW IT IS GRADED
Site Design:	Overall appearance of the site. Are the color choices good? Is the layout and navigation easy to follow?
Broken Links / Images:	Are there any "go nowhere" links, or missing pictures or pages?
Originality	Is the site the same as 10,000 other ones? What sets it apart? Is there content here that you can't find anywhere else?
Interaction w/ members:	Does the amateur/owner/webmaster interact with his/her members? Are there chat sessions, webcams, message boards, journals, etc.?
Update Frequency:	How often is the site updated? Based on our experience, a score of 5 would be an update every two weeks.
Load Time:	How fast (or slow) do the pages and images come in? Can dial-up people view it, or is it soley intended for high-speed access?
Personality:	Does the site and/or model have personality or do they give the impression they are just there to make a few bucks and go back to bed?
Content Amount:	How much content does the site have? Is it exclusive to the site, or can it be found in any newsgroup or other site?
Image Quality:	Are the pictures and videos clear? Are the pics large enough to see? Does the photographer seem to know what he/she is doing?
Promises:	Does the site deliver in its members area what it promises in its preview pages, or is it misleading or downright untruthful?
Pop-Ups:	Self-explanatory. A score of 10 means no pop-ups, a 1 would be pop-up hell.
Value:	Is the site worth what they are charging?